LEEDer Group Inc.
8508 North West 66th St.
Miami, Florida 33166 USA

Phone Toll-free: 866.814.0192 or 305.436.5030
Fax Toll-free: 866.818.0373 or 305.436.0086
E-mail Address: orders {at] LEEDerGroup [dot] com

Tag 314 309 Quality of Care Part 6 Pressure Ulcer Infections





KYDEX PRO Multi PodusLEEDerGroup.com: KYDEX Pro Multi Podus boot with ambulation pad Prevent Mitigate Heel Ulcers
    Current literature reports that all Stage II, III, and IV pressure ulcers are colonized with bacteria but may not be infected. Identification, diagnosis and treatment of infection, when present, are critical to healing a pressure ulcer.38 The infection occurs when the bacteria have invaded the tissue surrounding or within the pressure ulcer. As with any infection, classic signs and symptoms of infection may include purulent exudate, peri-wound warmth, swelling, induration or erythema (erythema may not be readily determined in individuals with dark skin pigmentation),
    increasing pain or tenderness around the site or delayed wound healing. These classic signs may not be as evident in someone with a granulating, chronic wound or an immuno-compromised or aged resident. Some infections may present primarily with pain or delayed healing without other typical clinical signs of infection.39 Clinicians have developed some tools, which may facilitate identifying and assessing an infection40, 41 and documenting progress toward healing.
    Wounds may be classified as infected if the signs and symptoms of infection are present and/or a wound culture (obtained in accord with accepted standards, such as sterile tissue aspirate, a “quantitative surface swab” using the Levine technique or semiquantitative swab) contains 100,000 (105) or greater micro-organisms per gram of tissue. A superficial swab may show the presence of bacteria, but is not a reliable method to identify infection. Findings such as an elevated white blood cell count, bacteremia, sepsis, or fever may signal an infection related to a pressure ulcer area or a co-existing infection from a different source.
  • PAIN
    The assessment and treatment of a resident’s pain are integral components of pressure ulcer prevention and management. “The goal of pain management in the pressure ulcer patient is to eliminate the cause of pain, to provide analgesia, or both.”42 Pain that interferes with movement and/or affects mood may contribute to immobility and contribute to the potential for developing a pressure ulcer or for delayed healing or nonhealing of an already existing ulcer. It may be difficult to assess the degree of pain in a resident who is cognitively impaired. Some strategies and tools exist to help determine the presence and characteristics of pain (e.g., nature, intensity and frequency).43, 44 Recent research suggests that a resident with a Stage IV pressure ulcer can feel as much pain as those with a Stage I or II ulcer.45 The relationship of pain to the pressure ulcer healing process is not yet clear. Pain is an individual perception and response and an individual’s report of pain is a generally valid indicator of pain. One resident may experience pain of varying intensity and frequency (e.g., continually or periodically) or episodically in association with treatments (e.g., debridement, dressing changes) or movement or infection, while another resident may not have or report pain.
    Research has found that chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers heal differently from acute wounds, primarily because of differing biochemical and cellular characteristics. Current clinical practice indicates that Stage III and Stage IV ulcers should be covered. Determination of the need for a dressing for a Stage I or Stage II ulcer is based upon the individual practitioner’s clinical judgment and facility protocols based upon current clinical standards of practice. No particular dressing promotes healing of all pressure ulcers within an ulcer classification.46
    For those pressure ulcers with significant exudate, management of the exudate is critical for healing. A balance is needed to assure that the wound is moist enough to support healing but not too moist to interfere with healing.47 Since excess wound exudate generally impairs wound healing, selecting an appropriate absorptive dressing is an important part of managing chronic wound exudate.
    Product selection should be based upon the relevance of the specific product to the identified pressure ulcer(s) characteristics, the treatment goals, and the manufacturer’s recommendations for use. Current literature does not indicate significant advantages of any single specific product over another, but does confirm that not all products are appropriate for all pressure ulcers. Wound characteristics should be assessed throughout the healing process to assure that the treatments and dressings being used are appropriate to the nature of the wound. Present literature suggests that pressure ulcer dressing protocols may use clean technique rather than sterile, but that appropriate sterile technique may be needed for those wounds that recently have been surgically debrided or repaired.48
    Debridement of non-viable tissue is frequently performed to reduce the amount of wound debris or non-viable tissue and to reduce the risk of sepsis. A variety of debridement methods (e.g., mechanical, sharp or surgical, enzymatic, autolytic, MDT) are available. Removal of necrotic tissue should enhance wound healing. Ongoing monitoring (and timely intervention in case of change in the character of the wound) is critical for areas with eschar and those areas that have been debrided.49 Many clinicians believe that stable, dry, adherent and intact eschar on the foot/heel should not be debrided, unless signs and symptoms of local infection or instability are detected.50 Some facilities may use “wet to dry gauze dressings” or irrigation with chemical solutions to remove slough. The use of wet-to-dry dressings or irrigations may be appropriate in limited circumstances, but repeated use may damage healthy granulation tissue in healing ulcers and may lead to excessive bleeding and increased resident pain. A facility should be able to show that its treatment protocols are based upon current standards of practice and are in accord with the facility’s policies and procedures as developed with the medical director’s review and approval.
    (For more information on the references below, visit the CMS Sharing Innovations in Quality website: www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/survey-cert/siqhome.asp.
    1 Cuddigan, J., Ayello, E.A., Sussman, C., & Baranoski, S. (Eds.). (2001). Pressure
    Ulcers in America: Prevalence, Incidence, and Implications for the Future.
    National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Monograph (pp. 181). Reston, VA:
    2 Gardner, S.E. & Frantz, R.A. (2003). Wound Bioburden. In Baranoski, S. & Ayello,
    E.A. (Eds.), Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles. Philadelphia, PA:
    Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
    3 Ayello, E.A. & Cuddigan, J.E. (2004). Debridement: Controlling the Necrotic/Cellular
    Burden. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 17(2), 66-75.
    4 Bergstrom N., Bennett, M.A., Carlson, C.E., et al. (1994). Treatment of Pressure Ulcers
    in Adults (Publication 95-0652). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15, Rockville, MD:
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy
    and Research.
    5 Thompson, P.D. & Smith, D.J. (1994). What is Infection? American Journal of Surgery,
    167, 7-11.
    6 Ayello, E.A., Baranoski, S., Kerstein, M.D., & Cuddigan, J. (2003). Wound
    Debridement. In Baranoski. S. & Ayello, E.A. (Eds.) Wound Care Essentials:
    Practice Principles. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    7 Bergstrom, N., et al. (1994). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15.
    8 Ayello & Cuddigan. (2004). Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 66-75.
    9 Sherman, R.A. (1998). Maggot Debridement in Modern Medicine. Infections in
    Medicine, 15(9), 651-656.
    10 Piper, B. (2000). Mechanical Forces: Pressure, Shear, and Friction. In Bryant, R.A.
    (Ed.) Acute and Chronic Wounds. Nursing Management (2nd ed., pp. 221-264).
    St.Louis, MO: Mosby.
    11 Kosiak, M. (1961). Etiology of Decubitus Ulcers. Archives of Physical Medicine and
    Rehabilitation, 42, 19-29.
    12 Frequently Asked Questions: Pressure Ulcer Staging and Assessment, Question 202
    (2000, July 28). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from
    13 Lyder, C., Yu C., Emerling, J., Empleo-Frazier, O., Mangat, R., Stevenson, D. &
    McKay, J. (1999). Evaluating the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for
    Pressure Ulcer Risk in Blacks and Latino/Hispanic Elders. Applied Nursing
    Research, 12, 60-68.
    14 Lyder, C. (2003). Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management. Journal of the
    American Medical Association, 289, 223-226.
    15 Fuhrer M., Garber S., Rintola D., Clearman R., Hart K. (1993). Pressure Ulcers in
    Community-resident persons with spinal cord injury: Prevalence and Risk
    Factors. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 74, 1172-1177.
    16 Cuddigan, Ayello, Sussman, & Baranoski S. (Eds.). (2001). NPUAP Monograph, 153.
    17 Ayello, E.A., Braden, B. (May-June 2002). How and Why to do Pressure Ulcer Risk
    Assessment. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 15(3), 125-32.
    18 Bergstrom, N. & Braden, B.A. (1992). A Prospective Study of Pressure Sore Risk
    Among Institutionalized Elderly. Journal of the American Geriatric Society,
    40(8), 747-758.
    19 Gosnell S.J. (1973). An Assessment Tool to Identify Pressure Sores. Nursing Research,
    22(1), 55-59.
    20 Bergstrom, N., Braden, B., Kemp, M., Champagne, M., Ruby, E. (1998). Predicting
    Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Multistate Study of the PredictiveValidity of the Braden
    Scale. Nursing Research, 47(5), 261-269.
    21 Bergstrom N. & Braden, B.A. (1992). Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 747-
    22 Braden, B. (2001). Risk Assessment in Pressure Ulcer Prevention. In Krasner, D.L.,
    Rodeheaver, G.T., Sibbeald, R.G. (Eds.) Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source
    Book for Healthcare Professionals (3rd ed., pp. 641-651). Wayne, PA: HMP
    Communications Pub.
    23 Ayello, E.A., Baranoski, S., Lyder, C.H., Cuddigan, J. (2003). Pressure Ulcers. In
    Baranoski S. & Ayello, E.A. (Eds.) Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles
    (pp. 245). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    24 Cuddigan, J., Ayello, E.A., Sussman, C., & Baranoski, S. (Eds.). (2001). NPUAP
    Monograph, 27 & 168.
    25 Ferguson, R., O’Connor, P., Crabtree, B., Batchelor A., Mitchell J., Coppola, D.
    (1993). Serum Albumin and Pre-albumin as Predictors of Hospitalized Elderly
    Nursing Home Patients. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 41, 545-549.
    26 Covinsky, K.E., Covinsky, K.H., Palmer, R.M., & Sehgal, A.R. (2002). Serum Albumin
    Concentration and Clinical Assessments of Nutritional Status in Hospitalized
    Older People: Different Sides of Different Coins? Journal of the American
    Geriatric Society, 50, 631-637.
    27 Maklebust, J. & Sieggreen, M. (2001). Pressure Ulcers: Guidelines for Prevention and
    Management (3rd ed., pp. 49). Springhouse, PA: Springhouse.
    28 Lyder, C. (1997). Perineal Dermatitis in the Elderly: A Critical Review of the
    Literature. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 23(12), 5-10.
    29 Bergstrom N., et al. (1994). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15.
    30 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). (1992). Pressure Ulcers in
    Adults: Prediction and Prevention (Publication 92-0050). Clinical Practice
    Guideline, 3.
    31 Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society. (2003). Guidelines for Prevention and
    Management of Pressure Ulcers (pp. 12). Glenview, IL: Author.
    32 Kloth, L.C. & McCulloch, J.M. (Eds.) (2002). Prevention and Treatment of Pressure
    Ulcer. Wound Healing: Alternatives in Management ( 3rd ed., pp. 434-438).
    Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
    33 Jones, V., Bale, S., & Harding, K. (2003). Acute and Chronic Wound Healing. In
    Baranoski, S. & Ayello, E.A. (Eds.), Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles
    (pp. 72-73). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    34 Cuddigan, J., Ayello, E.A., Sussman, C., & Baranoski, S. (Eds.) (2001). NPUAP
    35 Morrison, M.J. (Ed.). (2001). The Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers.
    London: Mosby.
    36 Bullen, E.C., Longaker, M.T., Updike, D.L., Benton, R., Ladin, D., Hou, Z., & Howard,
    E.W. (1996). Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 is decreased and activated
    gelatinases are increased in chronic wounds. Journal of Investigative
    Dermatology, 106(2), 335-341.
    37 Ayello, E.A. & Cuddigan, J. (2003). Jump start the healing process. Nursing Made
    Incredibly Easy! 1(2), 18-26.
    38 Bergstrom N., et al. (1994). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15.
    39 Gardner, S.E., Frantz, R.A., & Doebbeling, B.N. (2001). The Validity of the Clinical
    Signs and Symptoms Used to Identify Localized Chronic Wound Infection. Wound
    Repair and Regeneration, 9, 178-186.
    40 Gardner, S.E. & Frantz, R.A. (2001). A Tool to Assess Clinical Signs and Symptoms of
    Localized Chronic Wound Infection: Development and Reliability. Ostomy/Wound
    Management, 47(1), 40-47.
    41 Cutting, K.F. & Harding, K.G. (1994). Criteria for Identifying Wound Infection.
    Journal of Wound Care, 3(4), 198-201.
    42 Bergstrom N., et al. (1994). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15.
    43 American Geriatric Society. (2002). American Geriatric Society Guideline: The
    Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Journal of American Geriatric
    Society, 50(6), S205-S224.
    44 Gomez, S., Osborn, C., Watkins, T. & Hegstrom, S. (2002). Caregivers team up to
    manage chronic pain. Provider, 28(4), 51-58.
    45 Dallam, L.E., Barkauskas, C., Ayello, E.A., & Baranoski, S. (2003). Pain Management
    and Wounds. In Baranoski, S. & Ayello, E.A. (Eds.). Wound Care Essentials:
    Practice Principles (pp. 223-224). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &
    46 Ayello, E.A., Baranoski, S., Lyder, C.H., & Cuddigan, J. (2003). Pressure Ulcers. In
    Baranoski, S. & Ayello, E.A. Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles (pp.
    257). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    47 Schultz, G.S., Sibbald, R.G., Falanga, V., Ayello, E.A., Dowsett, C., Harding, K.,
    Romanelli, M., Stacey, M.C., Teot, L., Vanscheidt, W. (2003). Wound Bed
    Preparation: A systematic Approach to Wound Management. Wound Repair
    Regeneration, 11,1-28.
    48 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
    (March/April 2001). Position Statement: Clean vs. Sterile: Management of
    Chronic Wounds. Retrieved July 6, 2004 from www.apic.org resource center.
    49 Black, J.M. & Black, S.B. (2003). Complex Wounds. In Baranoski, S. & Ayello, E.A.
    (Eds.). Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles (pp. 372) Philadelphia, PA:
    Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    50 Bergstrom N., et al. (1994). Clinical Practice Guideline, 15.